Arguing that AI Chatbots cannot be accused of plagiarism simply because their data is stored in a different jurisdiction is similar to defending a criminal who has stolen jewels from one country and transported them to another. In an attempt to absolve themselves from any wrongdoing, the criminal asserts that they are innocent since the stolen items now reside in a different legal jurisdiction. This comparison draws parallels between the evasion tactics used by AI Chatbot companies and those employed by a criminal seeking to escape accountability. By shifting the physical location of the incriminating evidence, both the chatbot companies and the criminal attempt to distance themselves from the illegal act. However, this tactic does not erase the fact that the original offense was committed, regardless of where the data or stolen goods are originally situated and owned. In essence, the relocation of evidence does not negate the responsibility or culpability of the parties involved. Consequently, it is essential to acknowledge that the act of plagiarism, whether by chatbots or individuals, cannot be excused or invalidated by the physical placement of the data or stolen items. The core message remains unchanged: accountability and ethical behavior must be upheld, irrespective of the jurisdiction in which the evidence is housed.
Why AI Chatbot Companies Are the Ugliest Thugs Humanity Can Ever Get?
