The recent link of IIT in the Red Fort blast incident is a reminder that how bad actors operated from foreign lands are after the public resources to hijack them for their agendas. The problem is that not all public resources are expert at identifying security threats and hence need help from superior force intellects and next-gen policy think tanks to manage resources authentically and innovatively without being hijacked.
The recent bombing near the Red Fort is a major alert warning for the immediate enforcement of the corrective action plans onto the academia. The mainstream intellects and scholars are convinced about the profit-hungry nature of academia and are themselves fed-up of the retarded system resisting to change from decades. The bombing has drastically changed the attitude and mindset of the civilians demanding zero-tolerance through the establishment of a permanent third-party oversight onto the academia. This third-party oversight involves the direct collaboration of government and the special force not-for profit organizations. The complete corrective action plan advised by the Bibhorr Dialogue in consultation with special force stakeholders is discussed.
Following core features of a profit-hungry monstrous academia have been identified, that immediately require the corrective action plan into practice.
- The Institutions Replacing High-Profile Industry Experts with Phony Experts (Foreign Stooges) to Route Money Back to their Own Pockets
- The Institutions Competing to Rank Higher in the Flawed Global Academic Rankings
- The Authors Competing to Publish Articles in the Ranked Journals Using Public Money for boosting Phony Scholarly Images
- The Institutions Proving Incompetent to Make any Local Journal Globally Relevant (without the help of foreign stooges)
- The owners of Institutions Competing to Obtain Honorary Degrees from Foreign Land and Thus Questioning the Relevance of their Own Institutions
- The Institutions Competing to Collaborate Abroad Without Even Consulting the Security Agencies about the Possible Repercussions
- The Institutions Competing to Collaborate with Phony Tech Founders Without Consulting Security Firms
- The Institutions Becoming a Pawn for Furthering Phony Tech of Foreign Spying Agencies
- The Institutions Hesitating to Speak a Word When National Security is Compromised and Pretend as if They Do Not Exist in The Country
- The Institutions Shamelessly Copying the Profiles and Work of the Country’s Ethical Founders but Hesitating to Compete with Foreign Institutions in Taking Global Lead
- The Institutions Declaring Global Lead Only as Pawn for Furthering Concepts of Foreign Spying Agencies
Corrective Action Plan Advisory for Govt. or approval agencies like HECI/UGC/AICTE:
- Government Initiates a Program for Academic Oversight
- Government Calls Not for profit Organizations to Collaborate for the Involvement in the Program
- Government Disallows the Professors, Staff, VCs and all other Persons already affiliated to Academic Institutions to Participate or Take Lead in the Program
- Government also Disallows the Ex-Professors, or Ex-VCs to Participate or Take Lead in the Program
- Government Allows Only Not for Profit Organization to Take Lead in the Program
- The Not-for-Profit Organizations Choose the Academic Institutions whether private, IoE, state, or central institutions for regular oversight and direction.
- The Program Involves Only Special Force Bureaucracy because obsolete bureaucracy may act as pawn or foreign stooge creating delays in the implementation of the program
- The Not-for-Profit Organizations are paid by the Academic Institutes they Have Selected to Propel Reforms and Implement Corrective Measures and to further Measure the Improvements
- The reforms include a broad range of practices from conducting training of the professors on ethical and moral research practices to guiding VCs with the ethical governance and management practices.
- The Private Intelligence Firms and startups can also participate indirectly by giving advise only to the Not for profit.
- It is up to the Not for profits to consider or reject the advice of private intelligence or startup firms depending upon the criticality of the issue(s) involved.
- The Academic Institute Cannot Complain Govt. for the Implementation of the plans.
- The Preparation of the academy related corrective action plans and reforms is prepared and implemented only by the Not for profits without any interference from the selected institution.
- In case of the delays by the academic institution to implement the plans of the not for profits the same is communicated to the govt. and the marks in the final assessment report of the institute is deducted as decided by the not for profits.
- After the completion of the one cycle, govt can also continue with the second phase and more continuous cycles.
